112
edits
OlivierAuber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation]] didn't seem to exist, so I created it and it seems to work okay now. Happy editing! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:35, 26 Mar 2006 (EST) | [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation]] didn't seem to exist, so I created it and it seems to work okay now. Happy editing! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:35, 26 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
: Categorization is going to be a huge growing pain for us, I'm afraid. We'll just have to see what we (collectively) come up with. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:28, 27 Mar 2006 (EST) | : Categorization is going to be a huge growing pain for us, I'm afraid. We'll just have to see what we (collectively) come up with. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:28, 27 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
== Mediawiki + transclude== | |||
Thanks Blank for your explanation. My question was more about external transclusion ;-) I know that this question is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Transclusion_costs_and_benefits cause of dispute] but I'm sure that external transclusion into wikis could be very interesting for some specials apps, for example http://anoptique.com (look on top the aggregation of the Recent Changes). As far as I know, very few wiki engine allow it (PhPwiki, Wakka..). Maybe one day Wikimedia? [[User:OlivierAuber|OlivierAuber]] 19:16, 3 Apr 2006 (EDT) | |||
edits