User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions

→‎redirects for alternate names: it's up to you but ....
(→‎redirects for alternate names: I named em, so I think it is ok)
(→‎redirects for alternate names: it's up to you but ....)
Line 117: Line 117:


I think that people will type in their wiki name exactly as it is, if it is not there, then they should add it.  I am not so sure that alternate names are important.  By the way, I added most of these wiki to [[SwitchWiki]] and I think I added the wiki to many of them.  So I am comfortable deleting the wrong name. :-)  [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
I think that people will type in their wiki name exactly as it is, if it is not there, then they should add it.  I am not so sure that alternate names are important.  By the way, I added most of these wiki to [[SwitchWiki]] and I think I added the wiki to many of them.  So I am comfortable deleting the wrong name. :-)  [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
Will they type Meatball or MeatBall or MeatBallWiki or meetballwiki?  I just don't see the benefit of deleting a harmless redirect.  It's more work for you to delete, and possibly more work later when someone creates an article that alrready exists.  This may be just a huge big in mediawiki that won't let you find a page without having the name exactly right, but it causes amazing problems at wikipedia.  I've done it myself, created articles that already existed.  The redirects left over once all this is fixed each time means the next person to make the same mistake won't make the same mistake! [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]]
6,456

edits