Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→question about protection of page: another question) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (→question about protection of page: reply) |
||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
Here is another [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:All&action=history question] for me. Doesn't look like that page has been spammed very much, curious about your thinking. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Here is another [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:All&action=history question] for me. Doesn't look like that page has been spammed very much, curious about your thinking. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:That was spammed really badly on [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:All&diff=120899&oldid=84941 April 2012] (a really massive amount of spam links), and then five times in 2007 - all by IP editors. Granted, I agree it hasn't been spammed 'much' recently - but I feel that [[:Category:All]] is a 'major' category - effectively a 'front door' to WikiIndex, and it is for this latter reason why I personally think this needs protection (and it is only protected from IP editors - regular logged-in users can still edit). IMVHO - there are just some crucial pages which we should pre-emtively protect. And don't the regular sysops on here have a hard-enough time in keeping on top of the spammers? :-/ [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 08:48, 8 September 2012 (PDT) | |||
== Harrassment == | == Harrassment == | ||
edits