Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (→PayToEdit?: fix redirect) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
I expect to find useful things here - not advertisers and spammers. By listing things like "[[OneBuckWiki]]" we only promote advertisment bullshit and help them making money! This doesn't help the users to find useful wikis. Instead we should for example have a useful structure (e.g. categorisation) that helps finding things here...--[[User:Speckmade|Speckmade]] 03:18, 12 February 2008 (EST) | I expect to find useful things here - not advertisers and spammers. By listing things like "[[OneBuckWiki]]" we only promote advertisment bullshit and help them making money! This doesn't help the users to find useful wikis. Instead we should for example have a useful structure (e.g. categorisation) that helps finding things here...--[[User:Speckmade|Speckmade]] 03:18, 12 February 2008 (EST) | ||
: ''Hi, I think that a [[PayToEdit]] category would be a useful tool to express what we think is valuable about [[wiki]]. I do agree with Speckmade that we should figure out how to barnraise some category work around here, (feeling guilty). I would like to get folks together for an hour or two to trim down the [[Wikis to Add]] - anyone interested? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | : ''Hi, I think that a [[PayToEdit]] category would be a useful tool to express what we think is valuable about [[wiki]]. I do agree with Speckmade that we should figure out how to barnraise some category work around here, (feeling guilty). I would like to get folks together for an hour or two to trim down the [[WikiIndex:WikiProject:Wikis to Add|Wikis to Add]] - anyone interested? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:: I agree that we should make categories that are "not surprising" to our readers. | :: I agree that we should make categories that are "not surprising" to our readers. | ||
edits