Category talk:In preparation: Difference between revisions

reply to Leucosticte
No edit summary
(reply to Leucosticte)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Maybe we should put a limit (e.g. a year) on how long a site can stay in this category before we presume that it's never going to be ready? An exception might be sites like [[Wikimedia Wikidata]] that announce beforehand that it will be a long time in coming. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:29, 24 November 2012 (PST)
Maybe we should put a limit (e.g. a year) on how long a site can stay in this category before we presume that it's never going to be ready? An exception might be sites like [[Wikimedia Wikidata]] that announce beforehand that it will be a long time in coming. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:29, 24 November 2012 (PST)
:I would suggest an absolute maximum of a six months - surely in reality, a wiki can be up and running with meaniful content within a month!  But I agree for major projects like WMF - we should allow say a year.  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 14:03, 25 November 2012 (PST)