Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132
edits
Template talk:Wiki status: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→open close: new section
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→open close: new section) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
:I would say [[:Category:NeedsLove]]. I've been using this for wikis which have little or no 'constructive' editing, but have occasional 'maintenance' edits to delete spam. Does this seem ok to you? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 13:54, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | :I would say [[:Category:NeedsLove]]. I've been using this for wikis which have little or no 'constructive' editing, but have occasional 'maintenance' edits to delete spam. Does this seem ok to you? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 13:54, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
::That makes sense, although the description may need to be broadened because "functional but empty, or over-run by spam" doesn't really cover those situations in which the wiki has content, is kept free of spam, but has only a small amount of (but greater than zero) other constructive edits. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 15:59, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | ::That makes sense, although the description may need to be broadened because "functional but empty, or over-run by spam" doesn't really cover those situations in which the wiki has content, is kept free of spam, but has only a small amount of (but greater than zero) other constructive edits. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 15:59, 14 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
== open close == | |||
I think this template would do better as an open close type thing. Does anyone know how to do that? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||