Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,133
edits
WikiIndex:2013-2014 bugs and upgrades: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→MediaWiki version: ::::::: Arcane, do you think it is ok to just test out 1.20.5? (if that is what you are suggesting? and test it out with WikiIndex data? sorry, not so knowledgable!!) Best, ~~~
(→MediaWiki version: new security patches for MediaWiki released) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→MediaWiki version: ::::::: Arcane, do you think it is ok to just test out 1.20.5? (if that is what you are suggesting? and test it out with WikiIndex data? sorry, not so knowledgable!!) Best, ~~~) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::: Jack, is their a way to have control put into our hands to add questions or change them when needed? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ::::: Jack, is their a way to have control put into our hands to add questions or change them when needed? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:::::: They just released another round of security patches, latest versions are MW 1.19.6 and 1.20.5. I was planning to test out 1.20.5, but if need be, I wouldn't mind setting up a test wiki to see how 1.19.6 functions, but the differences in both basically amount to closing a few security holes and not much else, as far as I can tell, and having run both 1.19 and 1.20 versions of MediaWiki, upgrading to 1.20 should be easy and break no features, and all of the extensions installed have working 1.20 equivalents (most of which I have tested) that should be stable in a production enviroment wiki. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 16:58, 30 April 2013 (PDT)Arcane | :::::: They just released another round of security patches, latest versions are MW 1.19.6 and 1.20.5. I was planning to test out 1.20.5, but if need be, I wouldn't mind setting up a test wiki to see how 1.19.6 functions, but the differences in both basically amount to closing a few security holes and not much else, as far as I can tell, and having run both 1.19 and 1.20 versions of MediaWiki, upgrading to 1.20 should be easy and break no features, and all of the extensions installed have working 1.20 equivalents (most of which I have tested) that should be stable in a production enviroment wiki. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 16:58, 30 April 2013 (PDT)Arcane | ||
::::::: Arcane, do you think it is ok to just test out 1.20.5? (if that is what you are suggesting? and test it out with WikiIndex data? sorry, not so knowledgable!!) Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
== Images == | == Images == | ||