Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
MediaWiki talk:Sidebar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
comment
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (comment) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It is ok, I think we can use [[CamelCase]], even inside [[MediaWiki]]. Also, I think the term portal does nothing, so it should be removed as well. I would do it, but don't want to do a [[revert]] thing here. :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | It is ok, I think we can use [[CamelCase]], even inside [[MediaWiki]]. Also, I think the term portal does nothing, so it should be removed as well. I would do it, but don't want to do a [[revert]] thing here. :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:I accidentally saved my edit before finishing my edit summary :( What I was trying to say is that its fine to use [[CamelCase]] on articles/categories/templates as and when it is necessary (either for historical reasons, or for simplicity when using templates, etc). But for the sidebar, I just think it ought to be consistent - and being as the 'toolbox' is fixed, we ought to change our top sections to match. | |||
:And I'm not sure the portal should go - that term seems to be set in stone for all MediaWiki sites - and whilst we are NOT Wikipedia, most modern wiki folks will understand the wiki software, and then adapt to specific site. So whilst we can tweak and add stuff, the basic sidebar should ideally show the basic default consistencies - IMVHO :) [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 13:19, 3 May 2013 (PDT) | |||