1,756
edits
Template talk:RationalWiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
re
No edit summary |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::::That has to be the most epic response ever. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::::That has to be the most epic response ever. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::::: I wonder if there is a way to show to the rest of the world that wikiindex is a portal for pedophiles. I don't have a popular blog, but there must be a way. Does wikiindex get there funding from somewhere, let's find out. --[[Special:Contributions/62.210.129.149|62.210.129.149]] 00:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::::: I wonder if there is a way to show to the rest of the world that wikiindex is a portal for pedophiles. I don't have a popular blog, but there must be a way. Does wikiindex get there funding from somewhere, let's find out. --[[Special:Contributions/62.210.129.149|62.210.129.149]] 00:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::::::It's a portal for everyone and everything wiki-related. To document web collaborations and the information and opinions they disseminate, and to welcome members of those sites to participate in improving said documentation, does not imply an endorsement. By that logic, Wikipedia would be a portal for white nationalists/separatists/supremacists/etc. because it has an article on [[Metapedia]]. If it were necessary to dissociate from everyone with held some views one didn't agree with, it be necessary to dissociate from everyone. We can discuss the semantics of childrape more thoroughly elsewhere; this is not really the place. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | |||