390
edits
Category talk:Opt out: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::::At any rate, it's probably not all that important, seeing as no one bothered to opt out. However, it could become important if we were to start having articles that were critical of certain wikis or wiki people, because then the subjects of those articles would probably be more inclined to opt out of WikiIndex coverage. The question of how much criticism of that sort will be allowed is another open question. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::::At any rate, it's probably not all that important, seeing as no one bothered to opt out. However, it could become important if we were to start having articles that were critical of certain wikis or wiki people, because then the subjects of those articles would probably be more inclined to opt out of WikiIndex coverage. The question of how much criticism of that sort will be allowed is another open question. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::::: The reason we should include this option is plain human stupidity. Robot txts, secure-texts and private servers are all options, but someone might implement them wrongly and sees that someone has added there wiki to this site. If I where the owner of a discussion wiki concerning, for example real estate or marketprices and I find out that by a mistake the r-txt isn't implemented right, I would feel uncomfortable, knowing competition can check out my wiki 15 years after date. I am not sure what you mean to say with your second post. --[[User:Redgreenfourties|Redgreenfourties]] ([[User talk:Redgreenfourties|talk]]) 20:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||