1,756
edits
(→Banns: new section) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Banns: re) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
You seam to have rich experiences with banning [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Data_on_granting_and_denial_of_standard_offer_requests|denial of standard offer requests] | You seam to have rich experiences with banning [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Data_on_granting_and_denial_of_standard_offer_requests|denial of standard offer requests] | ||
Was there a reason given in You case? Had there been warning? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] | Was there a reason given in You case? Had there been warning? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] | ||
:It's a very convoluted situation, and at this point the proceedings have become pretty opaque. It is, after all, an ArbCom case. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC) |
edits