Template:Anarchopedia: Difference between revisions

Template:Anarchopedia (edit)

Revision as of 19:57, 19 December 2014

2 bytes added , 19 December 2014

no edit summary

Koavf

Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Administrators

3,210

edits

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *Anarchopedia is not intended as a 'discussion forum', nor a 'Web directory'.  However, due to the [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software, it is possible for anyone to add comments on articles on its discussion page, including any dissent or negative remarks.  Anarchopedia is anti-[[:Category:Capitalism|capitalist]] and anti-authoritarian.
 *The text of Anarchopedia articles are licensed individually, with the default being public domain. Several articles are reusable according to terms of the [[:Category:Wiki GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]] (GFDL). Therefore, any individual, company or organisation can use the most of the contents of Anarchopedia, while conforming under the 'free' terms of the GNU FDL. Some additional restrictions include for solidarity purposes only (that is, the content can only be used to further left-wing anarchist goals), non-commercial purposes, or strictly for use on Anarchopedia itself.
-*'Anarchistic points of view' (APOV): ideally, any encyclopaedic writing at Anarchopedia must conform to the anarchistic [[:Category:PointOfView|point of view]].  The '[[:Category:NPOV|neutral of point of view]]' policy, as found officially on [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]], is not considered useful on Anarchopedia, because it relies on one central 'authority' that makes decisions regarding the neutrality of an article, and ultimately carries out censorship when the article doesn't conform.  Naturally, it maybe difficult to arrive to an anarchistic point of view in all the cases.  On Anarchopedia, the writing rules aim at being appropriate to the rational people, even if those are not always of the same opinion.  The anarchistic points of view state that all the facets of a discussed point must be evoked according to these points of view, and that the article must in no way be declaring, or implying, or of even insinuating, that one of the points of view is that which is correct a priori.  The anarchistic points of view do not imply however the representation with equality from these various points of view.  Anarchopedia naturally grants place for the traditional or recent anarchistic points of view, but not from the 'being asserted' point of view of certain worse anarchistic groupings ('anarchist'-capitalist, national-'anarchists', - and in the kind in reconversion, or re-appropriation, to be made a new image -). Right-wing, pro-state, and pro-capitalist POVs are not welcome on Anarchopedia.  Moreover, if a point of view is for example only constant by certain groups of certain specific ideological tendencies, it will be described as such.
+*'Anarchistic points of view' (APOV): ideally, any encyclopaedic writing at Anarchopedia must conform to the anarchistic [[:Category:Point of view|point of view]].  The '[[:Category:NPOV|neutral of point of view]]' policy, as found officially on [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]], is not considered useful on Anarchopedia, because it relies on one central 'authority' that makes decisions regarding the neutrality of an article, and ultimately carries out censorship when the article doesn't conform.  Naturally, it maybe difficult to arrive to an anarchistic point of view in all the cases.  On Anarchopedia, the writing rules aim at being appropriate to the rational people, even if those are not always of the same opinion.  The anarchistic points of view state that all the facets of a discussed point must be evoked according to these points of view, and that the article must in no way be declaring, or implying, or of even insinuating, that one of the points of view is that which is correct a priori.  The anarchistic points of view do not imply however the representation with equality from these various points of view.  Anarchopedia naturally grants place for the traditional or recent anarchistic points of view, but not from the 'being asserted' point of view of certain worse anarchistic groupings ('anarchist'-capitalist, national-'anarchists', - and in the kind in reconversion, or re-appropriation, to be made a new image -). Right-wing, pro-state, and pro-capitalist POVs are not welcome on Anarchopedia.  Moreover, if a point of view is for example only constant by certain groups of certain specific ideological tendencies, it will be described as such.
 ;External links