331
edits
Template talk:RationalWiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Leftism
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] is an authority? That's truly funny. As well, "liberal-leaning" is not a synonym for "leftist." --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 02:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] is an authority? That's truly funny. As well, "liberal-leaning" is not a synonym for "leftist." --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 02:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:"Sites should be listed by site owners as how they would like to be described." Why would we do that? Then we would just become a mirror of their "about" page, basically, rather than exercising any independent journalism. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 02:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | :"Sites should be listed by site owners as how they would like to be described." Why would we do that? Then we would just become a mirror of their "about" page, basically, rather than exercising any independent journalism. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 02:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
::WikiIndex is not a site for journalism about and criticism of wikis. It's an *index.* If I want to find criticism of RationalWiki, it's easy. Just google "RationalWiki criticism." I get a bunch of hits. What I expect to see on WikiIndex is a listing, and some information perhaps about site history and status. I definitely don't expect to see the site described and characterized by someone banned there. And I don't think we want to ride herd on activity like this. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 02:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | |||