331
edits
User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Please stop vandalism/deletions: useless debate
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
(→Please stop vandalism/deletions: useless debate) |
||
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
:::Edit conflict with the above. Thanks, Arcane. Below, before I saw the above, I explain a bit about what I was doing. It's a basic wiki technique for a regular user dealing with serious disruption. It works. Occasionally, I've been blocked for "revert warring," but, in the end, I've always been vindicated, because I am *always* seeking consensus and standing for community welfare, as my goal. The multiple edits call rapid attention to the problem. It's very simple to stop my activity: just ask me! If this were a bit worse, I'd be asking for revision deletion. I think, under the circumstances, it probably doesn't matter. Nobody will take those claims seriously. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | :::Edit conflict with the above. Thanks, Arcane. Below, before I saw the above, I explain a bit about what I was doing. It's a basic wiki technique for a regular user dealing with serious disruption. It works. Occasionally, I've been blocked for "revert warring," but, in the end, I've always been vindicated, because I am *always* seeking consensus and standing for community welfare, as my goal. The multiple edits call rapid attention to the problem. It's very simple to stop my activity: just ask me! If this were a bit worse, I'd be asking for revision deletion. I think, under the circumstances, it probably doesn't matter. Nobody will take those claims seriously. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::"I've always been vindicated" Was that the outcome at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=433842952 ? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::"I've always been vindicated" Was that the outcome at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=433842952 ? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::Your middle name is "useless debate." It blinds you to what is actually being said. You pointed to the ban discussion on Wikipedia, which had nothing to do with what I was writing about above. Zilch. Revert warring was not an issue. I was banned on WP for creating a single sock and editing non-disruptively with it. No revert warring, no fringe advocacy, purely a status offense. My purpose was fulfilled. No, there would be no need to do on Wikipedia what I did here, because there are functioning, actively monitored noticeboards. I have done what I did here, on both en.wikiversity and beta.wikiversity, when administrative attention was thin. It gets attention. It's risky, because it can irritate an administrator. | |||
:::::Actually, come to think of it, I did do this on Wikipedia, early on. I revert warred with a blatant sock puppet, was blocked -- my first block --, immediately unblocked, and the admin blocked everyone else in sight. That was before I knew how to use the noticeboards. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 13:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
===How to restore the content I'm reverting=== | ===How to restore the content I'm reverting=== | ||