User talk:Koavf: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
262 bytes added ,  6 January 2015
Line 305: Line 305:
::I prefer undeletion because then anyone can read the content, if there is to be a discussion, which may occur. Because of controversy over this page, if it's undeleted, it could be blanked, as I suggested, or it could be moved into my user space, another possibility. It could be no-indexed. Whatever is necessary to address concerns.
::I prefer undeletion because then anyone can read the content, if there is to be a discussion, which may occur. Because of controversy over this page, if it's undeleted, it could be blanked, as I suggested, or it could be moved into my user space, another possibility. It could be no-indexed. Whatever is necessary to address concerns.
::For email, I would prefer a full XML export with page history, because it can be relevant. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
::For email, I would prefer a full XML export with page history, because it can be relevant. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Both Jason and Arcane approved the deletion as well. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 23:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Both Jason and Arcane approved the deletion as well. Noindex isn't going to achieve the goal that Koavf was concerned about, which was eliminating the reason for RationalWiki users to badmouth WikiIndex. The page will still be visible to RationalWikians, and therefore they'll still have something to say about it. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 23:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
1,756

edits

Navigation menu