WikiIndex talk:File deletion policy: Difference between revisions

→‎Obscenity: moving the fence
(→‎Obscenity: moving the fence)
Line 13: Line 13:
These are euphemisms and circumlocutions. But circumlocutions have no place at all in an explanation of a definition or policy. Whereas ''full frontal'' is an euphemism as well however well known this term may be, commonly used in [[Boobpedia]].
These are euphemisms and circumlocutions. But circumlocutions have no place at all in an explanation of a definition or policy. Whereas ''full frontal'' is an euphemism as well however well known this term may be, commonly used in [[Boobpedia]].
I think that the term "patently offensive" even though very subjective, would be a better part of the definition. Is it meant to arouse? (Anger, fright, lust...). As such anything humorous would be not part of the definition, which should also be mentioned. --[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:09, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
I think that the term "patently offensive" even though very subjective, would be a better part of the definition. Is it meant to arouse? (Anger, fright, lust...). As such anything humorous would be not part of the definition, which should also be mentioned. --[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:09, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
:'''Definitions''' Your suggestion is to take one phrase with "no real definition" and replace it with another? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 07:39, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
:'''Definitions''' Your suggestion is to take one phrase with "no real definition" and replace it with another? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 07:39, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
You can say so ;-) If both no-real-definitions compete, I would suggest that the later would save something like [[wp:The Birth of Venus]] and the former not.
5,933

edits