Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160
edits
WikiIndex talk:Naming conventions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Other pages
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→Other pages: favor camel case as internal standard) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
:: I don't mind CamelCase, and in fact, notwithstanding my comments below wishing for a standard, I'm fine with every meta page having a CamelCase redirect. Or redirecting the other way, if that's what we decide. [[Add a Wiki]] is the worst of both worlds. I'd prefer [[Add a wiki]] or [[AddAWiki]] (which brings up the question of the word "a", is it to be capitalized in CamelCase? This is complication I'd rather avoid. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:01, 7 Mar 2006 (EST) | :: I don't mind CamelCase, and in fact, notwithstanding my comments below wishing for a standard, I'm fine with every meta page having a CamelCase redirect. Or redirecting the other way, if that's what we decide. [[Add a Wiki]] is the worst of both worlds. I'd prefer [[Add a wiki]] or [[AddAWiki]] (which brings up the question of the word "a", is it to be capitalized in CamelCase? This is complication I'd rather avoid. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:01, 7 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
:''Yes, I agree [[Add a Wiki]] is the worst of both worlds and think it should be AddWiki, simple link language. [[MarkDilley]] | |||
I respect Mark's "open" approach. However, I recommend that we '''encourage''' sentence case. Reasons: | I respect Mark's "open" approach. However, I recommend that we '''encourage''' sentence case. Reasons: | ||