User talk:Sean Fennel: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Text replacement - "{{W|" to "{{Wp|"
(Fix double-redirect)
m (Text replacement - "{{W|" to "{{Wp|")
Line 28: Line 28:
:::This is copied from MediaWiki.org:
:::This is copied from MediaWiki.org:
<blockquote>IMPORTANT: Running a 1.3 or 1.4 wiki and don't want to jump to 1.5 yet? Be sure to upgrade to 1.3.17 or 1.4.11, also released today. Versions prior to 1.3.16 and 1.4.10 have a serious data corruption bug which is triggered by a spambot known to operate in the wild.</blockquote>
<blockquote>IMPORTANT: Running a 1.3 or 1.4 wiki and don't want to jump to 1.5 yet? Be sure to upgrade to 1.3.17 or 1.4.11, also released today. Versions prior to 1.3.16 and 1.4.10 have a serious data corruption bug which is triggered by a spambot known to operate in the wild.</blockquote>
:Note that they're on 1.4.1'''5''' currently. 1.4.13 added protection against WMF vulnerability attacks, and 1.4.15 renders more accurately in the IE7 beta. Oh, and 1.6 also introduces {{W|CAPTCHA}} support. You could do it before, but it took a lot more work in 1.5 than before. So in summary, Yeah, it's worth pushing for. &mdash;[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">@</span>]] 20:35, 11 Apr 2006 (EDT)
:Note that they're on 1.4.1'''5''' currently. 1.4.13 added protection against WMF vulnerability attacks, and 1.4.15 renders more accurately in the IE7 beta. Oh, and 1.6 also introduces {{Wp|CAPTCHA}} support. You could do it before, but it took a lot more work in 1.5 than before. So in summary, Yeah, it's worth pushing for. &mdash;[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">@</span>]] 20:35, 11 Apr 2006 (EDT)
::Okay, I put in a plug [http://www.WikiIndex.org/User_talk:John_Stanton#upgrading here]. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:12, 12 Apr 2006 (EDT)
::Okay, I put in a plug [http://www.WikiIndex.org/User_talk:John_Stanton#upgrading here]. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:12, 12 Apr 2006 (EDT)


Line 115: Line 115:
Thanks!  Got it now. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:12, 7 November 2006 (EST)
Thanks!  Got it now. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:12, 7 November 2006 (EST)


When you ask ''"Is it documented anywhere...?"'', I suspect you are looking for the friendly tutorial at {{W|Wikipedia:Picture tutorial}}.  There's also far more detailed documentation at {{W|Wikipedia:Extended image syntax}} and [[mw:Help:Images|MediaWiki:Help:Images]].
When you ask ''"Is it documented anywhere...?"'', I suspect you are looking for the friendly tutorial at {{Wp|Wikipedia:Picture tutorial}}.  There's also far more detailed documentation at {{Wp|Wikipedia:Extended image syntax}} and [[mw:Help:Images|MediaWiki:Help:Images]].


Those pages document the "image width syntax", which starts with "<tt><nowiki>[[Image:...</nowiki></tt>" and -- if necessary -- ends with something like "<tt><nowiki>...|150px]]</nowiki></tt>" to set the desired size, as alluded to by [[User:Sean Fennel]] above.  Should [[WikiProject:Logos]] mention the image width syntax?
Those pages document the "image width syntax", which starts with "<tt><nowiki>[[Image:...</nowiki></tt>" and -- if necessary -- ends with something like "<tt><nowiki>...|150px]]</nowiki></tt>" to set the desired size, as alluded to by [[User:Sean Fennel]] above.  Should [[WikiProject:Logos]] mention the image width syntax?

Navigation menu