Category talk:New: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "NeedsLove" to "Needs love"
m (Text replacement - "Wiki Age" to "Wiki age")
m (Text replacement - "NeedsLove" to "Needs love")
Line 40: Line 40:


==PROPOSAL: a follow-on category==
==PROPOSAL: a follow-on category==
Following the above discussions, when six months has elapsed, the 'new' category is no longer appropriate, and sometimes the other available status categories might not be appropriate.  So what about a ''''Fledgling'''' category (or similar) for slow or quiet wikis between 6 months and a year old?  Then from a year onwards, they should hopefully be 'active', if not then they can then reasonably be defined as 'dormant' or 'NeedsLove'.  This fledgling category could allow for an element of spamming, as a result of the infancy of the wiki not allowing a satisfactory anti-spam policy or measures.  Discuss please!  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 11:43, 26 September 2011 (PDT)
Following the above discussions, when six months has elapsed, the 'new' category is no longer appropriate, and sometimes the other available status categories might not be appropriate.  So what about a ''''Fledgling'''' category (or similar) for slow or quiet wikis between 6 months and a year old?  Then from a year onwards, they should hopefully be 'active', if not then they can then reasonably be defined as 'dormant' or 'Needs love'.  This fledgling category could allow for an element of spamming, as a result of the infancy of the wiki not allowing a satisfactory anti-spam policy or measures.  Discuss please!  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 11:43, 26 September 2011 (PDT)