6,456
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (Question for Ted) |
(to Mark) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Ted, why do you want to make an inactive, depreciated wiki, have a category link to blogging? It doesn't make sense to me, seems to be high noise to signal? What are your thoughts, Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Ted, why do you want to make an inactive, depreciated wiki, have a category link to blogging? It doesn't make sense to me, seems to be high noise to signal? What are your thoughts, Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
: Because it does have active content. It's not disabled, to my knowledge. As long as it's a wiki, I think it should be categorized. It's not important enough to me to "disagree" about, so if you'd like to remove the category, no worries. Just please note that when a category is removed without explanation, my tendency is to put it back, as I did in this case. Your reasoning for not having it is perfectly fine, of course. It just helps me if you state that reason. Thanks! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:14, 28 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
[[category:blogging]] | [[category:blogging]] | ||
edits