WordPress Wiki: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
774 bytes removed ,  29 June 2006
Not worried about it, just trying to make sense of it.
(to Mark)
(Not worried about it, just trying to make sense of it.)
Line 14: Line 14:


''This wiki is being depreciated, please use [[WordPress Codex]]''
''This wiki is being depreciated, please use [[WordPress Codex]]''
Ted, why do you want to make an inactive, depreciated wiki, have a category link to blogging?  It doesn't make sense to me, seems to be high noise to signal?  What are your thoughts, Best, [[MarkDilley]]
: Because it does have active content.  It's not disabled, to my knowledge.  As long as it's a wiki, I think it should be categorized.  It's not important enough to me to "disagree" about, so if you'd like to remove the category, no worries.  Just please note that when a category is removed without explanation, my tendency is to put it back, as I did in this case.  Your reasoning for not having it is perfectly fine, of course.  It just helps me if you state that reason.  Thanks! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:14, 28 June 2006 (EDT)


[[category:blogging]]
[[category:blogging]]
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160

edits

Navigation menu