6,456
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (That would be fine, just concerned about expanding admin functions.) |
(say more?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Found out why I can't see them: It seems that the "patrol" permission isn't automatically granted to regular users as of 1.6. —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">@</span>]] 22:54, 21 June 2006 (EDT) | ::Found out why I can't see them: It seems that the "patrol" permission isn't automatically granted to regular users as of 1.6. —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">@</span>]] 22:54, 21 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
is this an option we need to turn on? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:34, 22 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
The update to version 6.5 implemented a different scheme of user privileges I have listed the default values below. We don't want to give any special privileges to regular users because those could be used by spammers. I propose that we create a new user group "Editors" for people who we trust and who work on the wiki content, we can then create a set of "Sysop Like" permissions that would allow things like patroling. The last section in this list is my suggestions for permissions for the "Editors" group. [[User:John Stanton|John]] 13:52, 4 July 2006 (EDT) | The update to version 6.5 implemented a different scheme of user privileges I have listed the default values below. We don't want to give any special privileges to regular users because those could be used by spammers. I propose that we create a new user group "Editors" for people who we trust and who work on the wiki content, we can then create a set of "Sysop Like" permissions that would allow things like patroling. The last section in this list is my suggestions for permissions for the "Editors" group. [[User:John Stanton|John]] 13:52, 4 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 12: | ||
: That would be fine, just concerned about expanding admin functions. [[MarkDilley]] | : That would be fine, just concerned about expanding admin functions. [[MarkDilley]] | ||
could you say more about this concern? we wouldn't be giving anyone permission to do anything they can't already do, except for patrolling recent changes - unless I'm missing something, this feature can be isolated from everything else, so there would be no admin powers granted (although I'd love to see us expand admin powers to more people, but that's a seperate issue) [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:46, 5 July 2006 (EDT) | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
edits