Speculative Evolution Wiki (SpeculativeEvolution.Wikia): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:
We try to cater for adults who are interested in the science of evolution and also to help school kids learn and understand evolution.  We hope you will bear with us as combining both in the same website is tricky, please look for parts of the wiki that suit you.|author=Speculative Evolution Wiki: About|source=https://SpeculativeEvolution.Fandom.com/wiki/Speculative_Evolution_Wiki:About}}
We try to cater for adults who are interested in the science of evolution and also to help school kids learn and understand evolution.  We hope you will bear with us as combining both in the same website is tricky, please look for parts of the wiki that suit you.|author=Speculative Evolution Wiki: About|source=https://SpeculativeEvolution.Fandom.com/wiki/Speculative_Evolution_Wiki:About}}


This is the wiki for pre-existing speculative evolution works such as ''The Future Is Wild'', Dougal Dixon's books and many major projects like Neocene, Snaiad and Specworld (Which is currently undergoing a makeup for preservation purposes) and other speculative evolution projects that are not fan-made projects.  The reason for this is to undo the [[spam]] that has been piling up since 2014 and restore interest in this website.  If you wish to create an original project, please see <tt>Spec-Evo.Wikia.com</tt>.
This is the wiki for pre-existing speculative evolution works such as ''The Future Is Wild'', Dougal Dixon's books and many major projects like Neocene, Snaiad and Specworld (Which is currently undergoing a makeup for preservation purposes) and other speculative evolution projects that are not fan-made projects.  The reason for this is to undo the [[spam]] that has been piling up since 2014 and restore interest in this website.  If you wish to create an original project, please see [[Speculative Evolution Wiki (Spec-Evo.Wikia)|<tt>Spec-Evo.Wikia.com</tt>]].


We want to clarify that for edition and work in articles we need these to be good in quality and content, which means if the stuff anybody post is too low in quality, i.e. problems on grammar and/or organization, size of content or not related/canonical with its respective source, we are likely going to delete it.
We want to clarify that for edition and work in articles we need these to be good in quality and content, which means if the stuff anybody post is too low in quality, i.e. problems on grammar and/or organization, size of content or not related/canonical with its respective source, we are likely going to delete it.

Navigation menu