83,675
edits
User talk:Huw Powell: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fix redirects
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) (→Re: work on the new policies: So apparently Lumenos turned out to be useful, perhaps...) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Fix redirects) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Hello | {{TOC right}} | ||
==Hello== | |||
Huw Powell, | Huw Powell, I(we) have thousands of things to do. I think your are aware that [[WikiIndex]] has no cyber judge function (at present). Would you be so kind as to give CP and other readers time to overthink your point of view. With the hope that my english is understandable. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:33, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
I(we) have thousands of things to do. I think your are aware that [[WikiIndex]] has no cyber judge function (at present). Would you be so kind as to give CP and other readers time to overthink your point of view. With the hope that my english is understandable. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:33, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
:I think you mean PC, not CP? Your English is far better than my German. Far, far better. And thank you for the welcome! [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 06:12, 12 July 2009 (EDT) | :I think you mean PC, not CP? Your English is far better than my German. Far, far better. And thank you for the welcome! [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 06:12, 12 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Censoring dissenting opinion == | ==Censoring dissenting opinion== | ||
Hello again, I'm writing in reference to your recent edit of the [[RationalWiki]] article, wherein you removed the link to the following argument. "[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Criticism and rebuttals|Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki better than RationalWiki does]]". Your edit summary was, "11:08, 1 September 2009 [...] (Lumenos, please whine on the talk page.)" <del>Did you read the argument?</del> [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
Hello again, I'm writing in reference to your recent edit of the [[RationalWiki]] article, wherein you removed the link to the following argument. "[[Talk:RationalWiki# | :I'm sorry, I found that you had in fact replied, but due to the location ([...]the general disorganization of talk pages [and my inexperience with wiki editing]) I neglected to notice it until now. I have answered your rebuttal and I will give you some time to formulate a response (if you should wish to do so) before possibly adding the comment back. [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#How sympathetic or critical.3F .28Who decides.3F.29|Consensus on this matter seems to be <del>favoring the creation of separate articles for Constructive Criticism (although where the links to these articles may be is less clear</del>)]][Well just read the link.]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:13, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I'm sorry, I found that you had in fact replied, but due to the location ([...]the general disorganization of talk pages [and my inexperience with wiki editing]) I neglected to notice it until now. I have answered your rebuttal and I will give you some time to formulate a response (if you should wish to do so) before possibly adding the comment back. [[WikiIndex: | |||
::"Consensus" is you and Proxima agreeing? Also, you completely ignored and failed to understand the responses to your bizarre WP vs RW thesis. Also, why don't you respond to comments where they are made? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 00:50, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ::"Consensus" is you and Proxima agreeing? Also, you completely ignored and failed to understand the responses to your bizarre WP vs RW thesis. Also, why don't you respond to comments where they are made? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 00:50, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::It '''seemed''' like Dilley might favor it, but I should obviously take into account the editors edits and not just the policy page when making determinations about consensus. So I apologize for that. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:51, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | :::It '''seemed''' like Dilley might favor it, but I should obviously take into account the editors edits and not just the policy page when making determinations about consensus. So I apologize for that. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:51, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 52: | Line 49: | ||
:: Oh fsck off you irritating little piece of rectal slime. Do a fscking Google search for "cruft" and then fsck off. No, just fsck off. [[User:65.39.67.100|65.39.67.100]] 13:25, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | :: Oh fsck off you irritating little piece of rectal slime. Do a fscking Google search for "cruft" and then fsck off. No, just fsck off. [[User:65.39.67.100|65.39.67.100]] 13:25, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::: See also is for related things. Categories are for similar things. Only those wikis that are actually related (besides Proxima Centauri having an account on all of them) should be listed on see also. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:04, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ::: See also is for related things. Categories are for similar things. Only those wikis that are actually related (besides Proxima Centauri having an account on all of them) should be listed on see also. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:04, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::Thank you for a uummm possibly reasonable argument. I replied [[Talk:RationalWiki# | :::::Thank you for a uummm possibly reasonable argument. I replied [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Huw Powel removed four similar wikis from the RationalWiki article 2|here]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::1. the IP above is not me, 2. Nx is correct, 3. Why not talk about the RW article on its talk page? 4. They weren't "similar" except that they are wikis, with some overlapping membership. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 17:55, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::1. the IP above is not me, 2. Nx is correct, 3. Why not talk about the RW article on its talk page? 4. They weren't "similar" except that they are wikis, with some overlapping membership. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 17:55, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::I agree we should talk about the RationalWiki article there. But here we should talk about why you don't put in the edit history that you are deleting similar wikis? You don't think that all this controversy about censoring competition and criticism, would make such a move seem a bit sneaky? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 00:27, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::I agree we should talk about the RationalWiki article there. But here we should talk about why you don't put in the edit history that you are deleting similar wikis? You don't think that all this controversy about censoring competition and criticism, would make such a move seem a bit sneaky? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 00:27, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 58: | Line 55: | ||
:::::::It would be fun to start every reply to you with some sort of insult but I don't want to look like a frustrated fewl. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::It would be fun to start every reply to you with some sort of insult but I don't want to look like a frustrated fewl. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Thank you IP address. You probably won't be surprised that this isn't compelling me to leave. I'm a flexible person, who may actually change if you provide some constructive criticism. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 00:18, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :::Thank you IP address. You probably won't be surprised that this isn't compelling me to leave. I'm a flexible person, who may actually change if you provide some constructive criticism. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 00:18, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:[[Talk:RationalWiki# | :[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Related wikis discussion|Nx actually provided some plausibly legitimate reasons for Huw's edit]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 09:03, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
Hi Huw, regarding [ | =="Stalking"== | ||
Hi Huw, regarding [https://WikiIndex.org/index.php?title=Nx&action=history 00:00, 11 September 2009 Huw Powell (Talk | contribs) (27 bytes) (Undid revision 71272 by Lumenos (stalk))]. You may notice that when you link to user page through a redirect from ("mainspace"?), it removes many of the "stalking" functions from the toolbox. I find all this whining about cyberstalking extremely ironic, given a prior conflict I do not wish to bring up. [https://WikiIndex.org/index.php?title=Lumeniki&diff=71156&oldid=71110 Nx added some links] to the [[Lumeniki]] article. I am for sourcing "comments" which may be biased or dubious. That is why I created the page. Apparently Dilley is opting to end this practice now (as I noted on your user page) so I have redirected the links. Your input on WikiIndex (or simply my own) "policy" on [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#Biographical info|biographical info]], [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#Verifiability|verifiablity]], and notability (of the "see also" links in the [[Lumeniki]] article) is welcome, as always. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 09:01, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:It is not cyberstalking to look at someone's contributions. This is an open wiki. Being able to see the edits made by a user is a standard feature on open wikis. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 13:10, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | :It is not cyberstalking to look at someone's contributions. This is an open wiki. Being able to see the edits made by a user is a standard feature on open wikis. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 13:10, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Sheeeeww. Gosh I thought I was doing some serious cyberstalking. Thanks for explaining that, Hooves. Way back before it was evil, Hoover posted [[WikiIndex: | ::Sheeeeww. Gosh I thought I was doing some serious cyberstalking. Thanks for explaining that, Hooves. Way back before it was evil, Hoover posted [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#Legitimate acquisition of biographical info about .22adults.22|a more thorough explanation of his definition]]. PH seems to be less websearchophobic (and policyphobic) than the other RationalWikians. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:15, 12 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
On an "unrelated" note. You have asked me a question concerning a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Category:Lumenati_neologisms Lumenati neologism]. Now I like you even more than I used to. :-) This should not effect my objectivity in any way. It really shouldn't. (-; But I may be more inclined to be accurate and clear in communications. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 09:01, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | On an "unrelated" note. You have asked me a question concerning a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Category:Lumenati_neologisms Lumenati neologism]. Now I like you even more than I used to. :-) This should not effect my objectivity in any way. It really shouldn't. (-; But I may be more inclined to be accurate and clear in communications. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 09:01, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Gawd, Lumpy, before you stick me with an orange box, can you at last formulate an idea to communicate? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 01:52, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | :Gawd, Lumpy, before you stick me with an orange box, can you at last formulate an idea to communicate? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 01:52, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Well I thought I had. Apparently Huw cannot comprehend "simple" Lumenati concepts. ;-) I formulate many ideas that seem clear to me, but I would need feedback to know how it appears to someone else, and to know if they would have any interest in it. I spent a good deal of time on [[Lumeniki]] before debuting it here, but it doesn't make much sense for me to work and work at it, if I'm the only one interested in it. I've been pleased at the turnout so far, [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/User:Tmtoulouse including someone claiming to be the honorable Trent (god of RationalWiki)]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:01, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Well I thought I had. Apparently Huw cannot comprehend "simple" Lumenati concepts. ;-) I formulate many ideas that seem clear to me, but I would need feedback to know how it appears to someone else, and to know if they would have any interest in it. I spent a good deal of time on [[Lumeniki]] before debuting it here, but it doesn't make much sense for me to work and work at it, if I'm the only one interested in it. I've been pleased at the turnout so far, [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/User:Tmtoulouse including someone claiming to be the honorable Trent (god of RationalWiki)]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:01, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== No need == | ==No need== | ||
It is the convention at this wiki to have real people in the main namespace - but since you prefer not to, it is not a problem for you to stay in the user namespace. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | It is the convention at this wiki to have real people in the main namespace - but since you prefer not to, it is not a problem for you to stay in the user namespace. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:Thanks. If I change my mind in the future, is that ok? Just getting my legs here, and all... PS, I have no idea what Lumpy is on about in the above section. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 01:50, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | :Thanks. If I change my mind in the future, is that ok? Just getting my legs here, and all... PS, I have no idea what Lumpy is on about in the above section. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 01:50, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 78: | Line 73: | ||
:::Glad it was taken in the manner intended. I have a bad habit of coming up with silly, friendly corruptions of people's user names. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 15:29, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | :::Glad it was taken in the manner intended. I have a bad habit of coming up with silly, friendly corruptions of people's user names. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 15:29, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Re: work on the new policies == | ==Re: work on the new policies== | ||
Forgot you were involved; your suggestions are appreciated. Your proposed way of working on policies is pretty much what I had in mind, too. (09:59, 4 October 2009, unsigned by [[user:Felix]]) | Forgot you were involved; your suggestions are appreciated. Your proposed way of working on policies is pretty much what I had in mind, too. (09:59, 4 October 2009, unsigned by [[user:Felix]]) | ||