User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions

::I should add that I like you too Phantom Hoover, even though you have apparently claimed to be "[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Dude a dude]" and [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Edit wars|I am critical of a number of your arguments]] as well. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:37, 31 August 2009 (EDT)

You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT)  

:'''''[For others who are reading this, I believe Nx is referring to the dialog beginning with the [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Similar wikis|Similar Wikis "debate map"]] that I and Nx created on that talk page (although he is presently acting as though he was unaware of this) and subsequent "mass quoting" to which Nx expressed no objections that I remember. Bob is also apparently acting as if he is unaware of this, thus prompting me to create this clarification notice. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:36, 4 September 2009 (EDT)''''' You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT)

:Your prayers have been answered. I've moved the [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Debate maps|unfun house to a subpage]] and placed warning signs on the entry ways. BEWARE THE MADDENING [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Ikilumen IKILUMEN]! Howevar, in my perception, the arguments I present in [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#See also|the following sections]] were spot on:

:I want to know my agenda! Are any of the following my "agendas" that you are referring to. These all relate to the [[RationalWiki (en)]] article:

:What didn't you like about [[RationalWiki (en)]]? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:20, 4 September 2009 (EDT)

Please do not remove talk page comments as you did [https://WikiIndex.org/index.php?title=Talk:RationalWiki_(en)&curid=14774&diff=71123&oldid=71121 here]. I'm going to assume it was because of incompetence, and not malice. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 04:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT)

::Do not remove information from the article as you did [https://WikiIndex.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ARationalWiki_(en)&diff=71115&oldid=71114 here]. As I told you, I was working on merging it. If you don't do controversial edits to the article, when they are reverted it won't remove your talk page comments. In the future I will try to undo your wandalism to the article, without reverting our talk page comments at the same time. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT)

::::::::I now think I should have been replying to this stuff instead of edit warring with Nx. We discussed this also [[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Related wikis discussion|here]], and after that [[User talk:Nx#You can trust_Nx...|Nx gave up]] and chose instead to [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#Enforcement against editors|label me]] and poop on WikiIndex :-(. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:16, 12 September 2009 (EDT)

:::::It is a big relief that you do not intend to ban me. I believe conflict can lead to changes that are in "our" mutual interests. (By "our", I mean anyone reading this.) I am not sure whether you are referring specifically to the conflict between myself and the [[RationalWiki (en)]] bureaucrats, about including some formulation of a criticism, or if I am involved in a conflict between administrators. (Perhaps there are discussions on IRC or somewhere I am not aware of?) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:17, 27 September 2009 (EDT)