Category talk:Wiki engine: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(Organizing wiki engine information and interlinking)
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
There may be some overlap, but generally we go into more detail about the software, on the category page. And we talk about the information they are providing on their homepage, in the wiki description page.
There may be some overlap, but generally we go into more detail about the software, on the category page. And we talk about the information they are providing on their homepage, in the wiki description page.


Should the wiki description page be in the [[:Category:Wiki Engines]]? I would say not, otherwise we end up with each wiki engine listed twice (since each also appears as a sub category)
Should the wiki description page be in the [[:Category:Wiki Engine]]? I would say not, otherwise we end up with each wiki engine listed twice (since each also appears as a sub category)
-- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
-- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)


== Unpopular Wiki Engines ==
== Unpopular Wiki Engines ==


How to handle wiki engines where we find only one wiki using it. Maybe the article page should be added to [[:Category:Wiki Engines]], and we dont bother creating a a category for it? -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
How to handle wiki engines where we find only one wiki using it. Maybe the article page should be added to [[:Category:Wiki Engine]], and we dont bother creating a a category for it? -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)


== Naming of wiki Engines ==
== Naming of wiki Engines ==
Why is it UseModWiki, but OddMuse (not wiki)? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 11:46, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
Why is it UseModWiki, but OddMuse (not wiki)? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 11:46, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
:Good question Ted. It should probably be just 'UseMod', but that'll take a bit of changing! -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
:Good question Ted. It should probably be just 'UseMod', but that'll take a bit of changing! -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
209

edits