1,316
edits
(recent_changes_URL?) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
In order to have a clean, uniform look in the StructuredData template, wiki_recentchanges needs to be set to "no" if there is not a RecentChanges in the wiki. Words other than "no" show up ugly and distracting. | In order to have a clean, uniform look in the StructuredData template, wiki_recentchanges needs to be set to "no" if there is not a RecentChanges in the wiki. Words other than "no" show up ugly and distracting. | ||
: Could we rename <code>wiki_recentchanges</code> to something like <code>recent_changes_URL</code> to emphasize that we *want* the actual URL there, not merely the word "yes" ? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 14:38, 8 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
==If not all information available== | ==If not all information available== | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
: I'd recommend using "Unknown" instead of blank. That way, those pages will show up in [[:Category:Unknown]] for further research, if the owners don't do it themselves. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:36, 7 Feb 2006 (EST) | : I'd recommend using "Unknown" instead of blank. That way, those pages will show up in [[:Category:Unknown]] for further research, if the owners don't do it themselves. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:36, 7 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
:: Should we pre-fill the template on this page with the word "Unknown" ? |