6,456
edits
(→inactive wikis: wikis to add) |
|||
Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
: No, I meant that it is the end of the story. Once something's listed as "inactive" we ignore it forever. If it comes back, sure, it can be changed here, but I personally find the inactives to be very low priority. I'd rather spend time filling in Unknowns for active wikis rather than worry about the inactives. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:24, 1 November 2006 (EST) | : No, I meant that it is the end of the story. Once something's listed as "inactive" we ignore it forever. If it comes back, sure, it can be changed here, but I personally find the inactives to be very low priority. I'd rather spend time filling in Unknowns for active wikis rather than worry about the inactives. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:24, 1 November 2006 (EST) | ||
Ok, that seems reasonable. | |||
== wikis to add and mark's wiki list == | |||
Another question: how do the [[:category:Wikis to add|wikis to add]] relate to Mark's wiki list, I see no strike-outs, is this relation managed anyway? --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 15:58, 1 November 2006 (EST) | |||
: Mark was lazy one day when he found 100 wikis (or some number). Instead of using the "add" tag, he just put them in a list. That list hasn't been touched since then, as far as I know. The whole list should go away as those wikis have new pages created with the add tag. Some of them might've been added from other sources since that time. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:03, 1 November 2006 (EST) |
edits