Bureaucrats, interwiki, staff, Administrators
2,182
edits
Template talk:Wiki list: Difference between revisions
→Removal of 2 fields
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I hate that there's an edit link next to the box (referring to the section about the wiki) that doesn't edit the box! It's not a high priority for me, however. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 13:52, 21 Jan 2006 (EST) | I hate that there's an edit link next to the box (referring to the section about the wiki) that doesn't edit the box! It's not a high priority for me, however. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 13:52, 21 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
== Removal of 2 fields == | == Removal of 2 fields and more == | ||
* The "Edit Mode" field is nice information to have, but I think difficult for the average user to figure out and enter. Therefore it may be a barrier to people who might otherwise enter or edit our wiki pages. I believe that the cost outweighs the benefit and therefore this field should be removed in the interest of simplicity. | * The "Edit Mode" field is nice information to have, but I think difficult for the average user to figure out and enter. Therefore it may be a barrier to people who might otherwise enter or edit our wiki pages. I believe that the cost outweighs the benefit and therefore this field should be removed in the interest of simplicity. | ||
* By the same toke, I believe that the "Last Reviewed" date is unnecessary. It forces us to think about what a "Review" is, i.e. if you change anything on the record it has been reviewed? It is also a pain to update and redundant with the wikis existing functionality of keeping edit history. So I recommend its removal. | * By the same toke, I believe that the "Last Reviewed" date is unnecessary. It forces us to think about what a "Review" is, i.e. if you change anything on the record it has been reviewed? It is also a pain to update and redundant with the wikis existing functionality of keeping edit history. So I recommend its removal. | ||
* If we decide to do this it seems that it would be best to simply edit the "Wiki List" template. Alternatively, we could make a new template, but I'm afraid that will cause more confusion. | * If we decide to do this it seems that it would be best to simply edit the "Wiki List" template. Alternatively, we could make a new template, but I'm afraid that will cause more confusion. | ||
* Also, we should probably add "WikiNode" to this template and not create a separate template for that | |||
* Also, I don't think the "WikiTourBus" is significant enough to put on the template. Using WikiIndex, the tourbus isn't really that necessary? | |||
Thoughts? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 22:02, 15 Feb 2006 (EST) | Thoughts? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 22:02, 15 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
* {{tag|browse}} | * {{tag|browse}} | ||