Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
An encyclopedia with a politically conservative viewpoint | An encyclopedia with a politically conservative viewpoint, friendly to creationism and Christianity, and massively hostile to Liberals, homosexuals, and people who believe in the theory of evolution. The site was started in November 2006 by Andrew Schalfly and a group of homeschooled children to provide an alternative to the perceived anti-Christian, anti-American and anti-conservative bias of Wikipedia. The main purpose of the site is to provide a family-friendly resource for homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. However, some more adult topics such as homosexuality are also treated in depth. | ||
As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia has 22,091 registered users, of which 30 (or 0.14%) have Administrators rights. | As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia has 22,091 registered users, of which 30 (or 0.14%) have Administrators rights. Of these registered users 11086 were blocked (8691 for an infinite period). | ||
== | ==Criticisms== | ||
Many criticisms of the site can be found at RationalWiki [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F], but these include such things as the sysops and admins arbitarily deciding whether or not to enforce the [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments Conservapedia Commandments] (see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=His_Dark_Materials_(novel)&curid=51358&diff=493793&oldid=493777 this] and Commandment number 5, together with the fact 'Learn Together' is a sysop for one example). Other criticisms include removing cited facts and calling it 'liberal bias' simply because these facts do not conform to the preconceived notions of the leaders of the site.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abstinence&diff=next&oldid=207273] Another criticism is the driving away of experts from the site by, for example, demanding that they email a sysop proof of their qualifications before they continue to post on the site, after that sysop reverted edits on mathematics because they didn't understand them.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Mathoreilly&diff=485894&oldid=485890] | |||
Yet another criticism is of the selective enforcement of Conervapedia's "[http://www.conservapedia.com/90/10 90/10 Rule]", which, despite being "a guideline", is a popular way for the sysops to squelch debate via blocking and threats of same. | |||
[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]] | [[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]] | ||
[[Category:FoundedIn2006]] | [[Category:FoundedIn2006]] | ||
[[Category:Wingnuts]] | |||