1,853
edits
RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
}} | }} | ||
RationalWiki started in May 2007 | RationalWiki wi a wiki which supports scientific investigation and the scientific method against blind dogma. | ||
==History== | |||
RationalWiki started in May 2007 after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned for trying to counteract the overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political bias, largely by debating the issues on talk-pages. Althought the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. | |||
==Rationalwiki today== | |||
Most articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, many editors are practicing Christans or Jews, tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. | |||
The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Astrology, New Age and many others. | The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Astrology, New Age and many others. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
<br>Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:- | <br>Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:- | ||
<Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote> | <Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote> | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. Criticism of Conservapedia on RationalWiki and elsewhere is extreme. Due to the authoritarian and incompetent management on Conservapedia, even people who generally edit wikis responsibly may be tempted to vandalize Conservapedia (The fact that on Conservapedia, 'vandalism' seems to include 'adding verified, cited facts that disagree with Fundamentalist dogma' makes 'vandalism' easier than it should be). As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientific content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia's lunacy in the following manners: | |||
*Arguing (such as in the case of arguing that the Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, was, in fact, a professor); | |||
*Adding content that portrays Liberals as something other than Evil Incarnate; | |||
*Openly mocking the site owner and administrators of Conservapedia | |||
*Trying to add scientific content to pages espousing only a young-Earth creationist POV | |||
*Showing outright contempt for the site, fundamentalist Christianity, homophobia, misogyny and extreme conservatism in general | |||
*Trying to moderate lies against liberal politicians | |||
*Adding facts about conservatives which illustrates the hypocrisy of the site | |||
*Possibly manipulating page-view counts to highlight intolerant and unscientific content | |||
*Adding parody and false information in run-of-the-mill articles | |||
*Fooling Conservapedia administrators through misdirection on Rationalwiki | |||
*Utilising Poe's Law to undermine the credibility of Conservapedia | |||
On RationalWiki | ===On RationalWiki=== | ||
* | *A few the users hold Fundamentalist Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, the removal of a woman's right to have an abortion, etc. | ||
* | *Some of the admins and users openly espouse atheism on their user pages, and criticize what they see as various religious irrationalities | ||
* | *Allegations of cyber-terrorism, posting of pornography and use of foul language have also been made by Andy's Acolytes,but no proof has been offered which links any of this specifically to senior editors at RationalWiki. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/FBI_incident The FBI has no comment]. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||