RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

RationalWiki (en) (edit)

Revision as of 01:45, 21 August 2008

2,118 bytes removed ,  21 August 2008
no edit summary
(Tiresome!)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
}}
}}


RationalWiki is a wiki which supports scientific investigation and the scientific method against blind dogma.
RationalWiki started in May 2007 responsing to [[Conservapedia]]. The content of the Wiki deals with Conservapedia a great deal but they also branched out into skepticism.  


==History==
The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Astrology, New Age and many others.
RationalWiki started in May 2007 after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned for trying to counteract the overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political bias, largely by debating the issues on talk-pages.  Althought the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia.
 
==Rationalwiki today==
Most articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, many editors are practicing Christians or Jews, tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism.
 
The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Creationism, Astrology, New Age and many others.


Their stated goals are:  
Their stated goals are:  
Line 26: Line 20:
*Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
*Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.


Despite this branching into other areas, most of their traffic is to the page [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F What is going on at Conservapedia?]
Most of their traffic is to do with the page [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F What is going on at Conservapedia?]
The website has a controversial and highly unusual sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases.
The website has a highly controversial sense of humour.
<br>Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:-
<br>Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:-
<Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote>
<Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote>
==Criticism==
Many of the members, especially admins admit to having been vandals at many different wikis including [[Conservapedia]]. They have attacked Conservapedia in the following manners
 
*Fighting and picking fights;
*Trying to remove content;
*Blanking pages, including pages of admins;
*Using foul language against other editors;
*Showing outright contempt for the site, conservatism in general, Christianity, and family values;
*The insertion of objectionable content, such as porn images and links to porn sites;
*Lying, by either including deliberately false article content, or lying in their own conduct;
*Vandalism and cyber-terrorist tactics.


==Criticism==
Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. Criticism of Conservapedia on RationalWiki and elsewhere is extreme. Due to the authoritarian and incompetent management on Conservapedia, even people who generally edit wikis responsibly may be tempted to vandalize Conservapedia. The fact that on Conservapedia, 'vandalism' seems to include 'adding verified, cited facts that disagree with Fundamentalist dogma' makes 'vandalism' much easier than it should be.  many editors 'vandalize' the site without even realizing it.  As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientific content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia's lunacy in the following manners:


*Arguing (such as in the case of arguing that the Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, was, in fact, a professor);
*Adding content that portrays Liberals as something other than Evil Incarnate;
*Openly mocking the site owner and administrators of Conservapedia
*Trying to add scientific content to pages espousing only a young-Earth creationist POV
*Showing outright contempt for the site, fundamentalist Christianity, homophobia, misogyny and extreme conservatism in general
*Trying to moderate or refute lies against liberal politicians
*Adding facts about conservatives which illustrates the hypocrisy of the site
*Possibly manipulating page-view counts to highlight intolerant and unscientific content
*Adding parody and false information in run-of-the-mill articles
*Fooling Conservapedia administrators through misdirection on Rationalwiki
*Utilising Poe's Law to undermine the credibility of Conservapedia
*Getting blamed for every prankster, troll or vandal who harasses Conservapedia.


===On RationalWiki===
On RationalWiki


*A few the users hold Fundamentalist Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, the removal of a woman's right to have an abortion, etc.
*Many of the users hold Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc.
*Some of the admins and users openly espouse atheism on their user pages, and criticize what they see as various religious irrationalities
*Many of the admins insult religion on their user pages
*Allegations of cyber-terrorism, posting of pornography and use of foul language have also been made by Andy's Acolytes,but no proof has been offered which links any of this specifically to senior editors at RationalWiki.  [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/FBI_incident The FBI has no comment].
*Many users at RationalWiki will remove factual material, even if backed up by sources, from articles, which are supposed to unoffically express a liberal point of views for example see http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Liberal&curid=935&diff=202920&oldid=202917


==See also==
==See also==
Deborah
33

edits

Retrieved from "https://wikiindex.org/w/Special:MobileDiff/56612"

Navigation menu