54
edits
Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war (edit)
Revision as of 22:11, 21 November 2008
, 21 November 2008no edit summary
No edit summary |
Jazzman831 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::::::::Wait, your're telling me that you are writing the article about Conservapedia, but you don't even know enough about Conservapedia to know that block rights are given out separately from sysop? How is anybody supposed to believe that anything you write is true, when the only edits you make on Conservapedia are vandalism, and you clearly know about no other aspects of the wiki?? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 02:12, 21 November 2008 (EST) | :::::::::Wait, your're telling me that you are writing the article about Conservapedia, but you don't even know enough about Conservapedia to know that block rights are given out separately from sysop? How is anybody supposed to believe that anything you write is true, when the only edits you make on Conservapedia are vandalism, and you clearly know about no other aspects of the wiki?? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 02:12, 21 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::::::::::I've made constructive edits to Conservapedia. Those homeschooled kids will be at a disadvantage all their lives because they haven't got a proper education. I don't mind giving them a bit of advice about staying healthy etc. I make a few constructive edits in areas that aren't controversial. I won't say more or you'll be able to trace my sockpuppets. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 03:17, 21 November 2008 (EST) | ::::::::::I've made constructive edits to Conservapedia. Those homeschooled kids will be at a disadvantage all their lives because they haven't got a proper education. I don't mind giving them a bit of advice about staying healthy etc. I make a few constructive edits in areas that aren't controversial. I won't say more or you'll be able to trace my sockpuppets. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 03:17, 21 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:::::::::::Sooooo you won't admit what your username on CP is, because you are knowingly breaking the rules against sockpuppets, you admit your vandalism (and flaunt it), and *I'm* the one who's too biased to edit? How did you become an admin here anyway? (And why haven't you called for the neutral admin you promised almost a week ago?) [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 17:11, 21 November 2008 (EST) | |||
What's this article for? I thought that this was supposed to be an online wiki phonebook, not a place for wikis to criticize each other. This will grow out of control. Someone might try to make a [[Wookieepedia]] vs. [[Star Wars Fanon]] article, an [[Uncyclopedia]] vs. [[Illogicopedia]] article, or even an [[Uncyclopedia]]/ [[Illogicopedia]] vs. [[Wikia]] article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 00:03, 16 November 2008 (EST) | What's this article for? I thought that this was supposed to be an online wiki phonebook, not a place for wikis to criticize each other. This will grow out of control. Someone might try to make a [[Wookieepedia]] vs. [[Star Wars Fanon]] article, an [[Uncyclopedia]] vs. [[Illogicopedia]] article, or even an [[Uncyclopedia]]/ [[Illogicopedia]] vs. [[Wikia]] article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 00:03, 16 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Uncyclopedia has plenty of criticism of the blocking policy. Encyclopedia Dramatica is impossible to edit because any attempt to edit triggers a spam filter. Impartial administrators need to decide what this wiki is for. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:32, 16 November 2008 (EST) | Uncyclopedia has plenty of criticism of the blocking policy. Encyclopedia Dramatica is impossible to edit because any attempt to edit triggers a spam filter. Impartial administrators need to decide what this wiki is for. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:32, 16 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:It's hardly a criticism. On a humorwiki you get blocked humorously and without much sense. Ooooooh that's a harsh criticism indeed. And spam filter? If that's the only reason why there's no criticism, then how did the article get there in the first place? Clearly if someone wanted to write a criticism they could get around the spam filter in the same way. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:28, 16 November 2008 (EST) | :It's hardly a criticism. On a humorwiki you get blocked humorously and without much sense. Ooooooh that's a harsh criticism indeed. And spam filter? If that's the only reason why there's no criticism, then how did the article get there in the first place? Clearly if someone wanted to write a criticism they could get around the spam filter in the same way. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:28, 16 November 2008 (EST) | ||