5,637
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Wikiindex: Explanation of reversion
m (Refactoring) |
(→Wikiindex: Explanation of reversion) |
||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
::::I think there should be a section warning potential users that they can get blocked for doing things that they don't know are wrong. I'm not sure what we can do as we agreed to accept independent arbitration. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 16:43, 26 November 2008 (EST) | ::::I think there should be a section warning potential users that they can get blocked for doing things that they don't know are wrong. I'm not sure what we can do as we agreed to accept independent arbitration. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 16:43, 26 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:::::Good idea. I've started a "Editors' Guidelines" section, which I'm sure could be expanded upon. And I stand by my misstatements. --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 16:25, 27 November 2008 (EST) | :::::Good idea. I've started a "Editors' Guidelines" section, which I'm sure could be expanded upon. And I stand by my misstatements. --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 16:25, 27 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::::::I disagree and have reverted accordingly. They seem to present your personal opinions and not the actual policy of the site. Although Wikiindex does not appear to have a neutrality policy akin to that of Wikipedia, I fail to see how such highly subjective "guidelines" fall into the charter of Wikiindex. We are not offering such "advice" for any other site listed here at Wikiindex and its inclusion is inflammatory. Surely editors can figure out from the current description whether Conservapedia is a wiki they would enjoy (or loathe) working on. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:27, 28 November 2008 (EST) | |||