5,637
edits
User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki License
(Wiki License) |
|||
| Line 1,246: | Line 1,246: | ||
:Well, when using {{tl|Inactive}}, the infobox is almost totally hidden, and the logo is replaced with a "this wiki is inactive" picture. While when keeping the wiki template with wiki_status = Inactive, the infobox still appears normally. [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 03:11, 10 March 2009 (EDT) | :Well, when using {{tl|Inactive}}, the infobox is almost totally hidden, and the logo is replaced with a "this wiki is inactive" picture. While when keeping the wiki template with wiki_status = Inactive, the infobox still appears normally. [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 03:11, 10 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Ah, right, categories remain the same when using {{tl|wiki}} with wiki_status = Inactive ([[Whistleblowers Canada|example]]). [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 03:23, 10 March 2009 (EDT) | ::Ah, right, categories remain the same when using {{tl|wiki}} with wiki_status = Inactive ([[Whistleblowers Canada|example]]). [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 03:23, 10 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Wiki License == | |||
Hi Mark. I just asked the same question of [[User:Speckmade]]: how do we categorize sites which claim copyright of user submission within the "Wiki License" parameter of <nowiki>{{Wiki}}</nowiki>? Currently there are categories for most of the "copyleft" wiki licenses, but there's no way to categorize wikis which don't follow this practice. I'd make one myself, but I'm not really sure what to call it. I assume that people will want to know when a site retains copyright over submissions. Thanks, [[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:42, 13 March 2009 (EDT) | |||