146
edits
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
:Where is the admin abuse page on this wiki? I searched long and hard for it, but could not find it. [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=next&oldid=67346] is a clear case of one person abusing their admin powers to protect an edit they want to protect from criticism. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 05:33, 30 June 2009 (EDT) | :Where is the admin abuse page on this wiki? I searched long and hard for it, but could not find it. [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=next&oldid=67346] is a clear case of one person abusing their admin powers to protect an edit they want to protect from criticism. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 05:33, 30 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
::[[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki]], but it seems there are no active bureaucrats. | ::[[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki]], but it seems there are no active bureaucrats. | ||
=="Protected "RationalWiki": In some Moslim if it comes out that a person isan atheist that can mean a death sentence, therfore users need a warning that their privacy isn't safe at RationalWiki."== | |||
I have never seen such an incoherent edit comment, from an admin, or anyone, for that matter. Admin abuse procedures will proceed. PC is pursuing a personal vendetta and using admin powers to protect her edits. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 02:47, 2 July 2009 (EDT) |
edits