1,136
edits
Category talk:ScribbleWiki: Difference between revisions
posted question to the right part of the blog this time
(I vote to keep spam link) |
(posted question to the right part of the blog this time) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:"What happened to all the comments that used to be on this page? Did you have server crash? ;) You know that scribblewiki.com says nothing but 'It works', now. What works exactly?" | :"What happened to all the comments that used to be on this page? Did you have server crash? ;) You know that scribblewiki.com says nothing but 'It works', now. What works exactly?" | ||
:I say we instead link to a mirror of the original page or (if that can't be found) a link that describes what happened. If none other exists, maybe I will make one from memory. '''If my comment doesn't appear soon, I would say the link constitutes spam, but I wouldn't delete the link''' however, I would just tell people not to bother commenting and post also a link (from my wiki) that describes what they removed from the blog. ScibbleWiki was almost as good as Referata is, before this incident. And at least ScribbleWiki had a place for people to share information about it, but now they are trying to hide what they did, while continuing to profit from advertising; using the popularity their blog has gotten from their loosing the data of many who put too much trust in their service. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:21, 11 August 2009 (EDT) | :I say we instead link to a mirror of the original page or (if that can't be found) a link that describes what happened. If none other exists, maybe I will make one from memory. '''If my comment doesn't appear soon, I would say the link constitutes spam, but I wouldn't delete the link''' however, I would just tell people not to bother commenting and post also a link (from my wiki) that describes what they removed from the blog. ScibbleWiki was almost as good as Referata is, before this incident. And at least ScribbleWiki had a place for people to share information about it, but now they are trying to hide what they did, while continuing to profit from advertising; using the popularity their blog has gotten from their loosing the data of many who put too much trust in their service. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:21, 11 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
I posted the following comment on the [http://scribblewikiblog.com/downtime/#comments correct "downtime"] part of the blog, so I'll see whether or not they will post it. "This page used to have all a great number of comments made by you and your customers when you lost their wikis. Many of us have linked to this page because it used to have some historical value. Why did you remove all the comments from this page?" [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:37, 11 August 2009 (EDT) | |||