Talk:WikiFactor: Difference between revisions
WikiFactor and caching
(→New template: upd.) |
(WikiFactor and caching) |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
: Please, have a look on [[Proposal:integrate new data into template:wiki]]! Greetings --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:04, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | : Please, have a look on [[Proposal:integrate new data into template:wiki]]! Greetings --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:04, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: I included two new parameters <code>wiki factor</code> and <code>wiki factor URL</code> into [[template:size]]. Have fun! --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 17:25, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | :: I included two new parameters <code>wiki factor</code> and <code>wiki factor URL</code> into [[template:size]]. Have fun! --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 17:25, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
== WikiFactor and caching == | |||
I collect stats for [[Rosetta Code]] blog posts and the admin there noted to me not long ago that the views count in the wiki statistics was skewed because of caching. If someone views a cached page in the wiki, it is not counted in the wikiviews because it doesn't trigger the script that keeps track of those views. I realize there's nothing much that can be done here about that except maybe put up a disclaimer or somehow create/promote a caching plugin that does count cache views on the stats page. I thought it should be noted somewhere though. --[[User:129.21.93.164|129.21.93.164]] 10:08, 14 August 2009 (EDT) | |||