1,853
edits
Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia): Difference between revisions
m
Reverted edits by Betelgeuse (Talk); changed back to last version by Proxima Centauri
Betelgeuse (talk | contribs) (Replacing page with '<big><big><big><big><big><big><big>PROXIMA CENTAURI IS ABUSING HER POWERS. STOP HER!</big></big></big></big></big></big></big>') |
m (Reverted edits by Betelgeuse (Talk); changed back to last version by Proxima Centauri) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've deleted the category Liberapedia. There used to be a second wiki in the category, Liberapediapedia. Liberapediapedia perished with [[ScribbleWiki]]. There's no point in a category with only one wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 15:17, 21 November 2008 (EST) | |||
==Protection== | |||
What was so horrible about my contributions that a sysop (who btw is an administrator at Liberapedia, and therefore has a conflict of interest) had to lock this article '''FOR A MONTH'''? I admit that the Cyberbullying section was [[wikipedia:WP:POINT|pointy]], but the rest was merely copyediting, and removing redundant and confusing info about the whole domain name thing. Oh, and '''you reverted a spelling correction''' | |||
You removed content from the page and that can be a blockable offense at at wikis. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:04, 8 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
:The only "content" I removed was the minutiae of your DNS problems, specifically the search engine rankings, and I replaced it with a single generic sentence. I'm not censoring anything, I'm merely trying to improve the article. | |||
:And if we're dishing out threats now: You used your protection powers (in a grossly inappropriate way) and threatened to use your blocking powers in a content dispute. That can lead to you losing your sysop powers at wikis. | |||
Iv feel you're here just to troll and cause me trouble and I expect the bureaucrats here to take that into account. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 05:14, 8 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
:Oh, ok, let's call the opponent a troll and we've magically won the argument. Hurray. Oh wait, that didn't work so well last time... | |||
:Oh, and there's still a spelling mistake in the article | |||