Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge: Difference between revisions

Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge (edit)

316 bytes added , 26 August 2009

agree

174

edits

Revision as of 23:21, 29 June 2009 (edit) Huw Powell (talk \| contribs) (New page: "It appears there was quite a bit of money spent to get the wiki well designed and someone thought of a really good name for it. ASK can't compete with the lavish design that the Schlafly ...)		Revision as of 19:43, 26 August 2009 (edit) (undo) Nx (talk \| contribs) (agree) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I find this comment rather bizarre. First, it has no citation, it just vaguely asserts something that may or may not be true - and probably isn't. It's not too hard to build a nice-looking wiki interface with a little effort. [[User:Huw Powell\|Huw Powell]] 19:21, 29 June 2009 (EDT)		I find this comment rather bizarre. First, it has no citation, it just vaguely asserts something that may or may not be true - and probably isn't. It's not too hard to build a nice-looking wiki interface with a little effort. [[User:Huw Powell\|Huw Powell]] 19:21, 29 June 2009 (EDT)

			:I agree. I've removed it because it felt like sarcasm and mocking. I don't think A Storehouse of Knowledge is a good name (it's too long for a website), and the design is standard monobook. Conservapedia's skin is also monobook with a few custom colors and minor tweaks. [[User:Nx\|Nx]] 15:43, 26 August 2009 (EDT)