173
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Similar wikis
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
:Easy. Websites with an aim of discussing controversial topics. Liberapedia isn't meant to do that; it desperately wants to be a parody of Conservapedia, a direction RationalWiki has been moving away from significantly (I'm told that before the crash it was agreed to purge the mainspace of CP references). [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:33, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | :Easy. Websites with an aim of discussing controversial topics. Liberapedia isn't meant to do that; it desperately wants to be a parody of Conservapedia, a direction RationalWiki has been moving away from significantly (I'm told that before the crash it was agreed to purge the mainspace of CP references). [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:33, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Who should define the intentions of a wiki, those who are sympathetic of the wiki or those who are critical? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:43, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | ::Who should define the intentions of a wiki, those who are sympathetic of the wiki or those who are critical? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:43, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Those who are in charge. As the mob is in charge at RW, there is no easy way to ask it, but the [http://rationalwiki.blogspot.com mission statement] sums it up. I really think that DebatePedia should be removed, as it has little to do with the mission statement; the atheism ones are OK, because atheism and rationalism are closely related. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:48, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | |||