Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 298: Line 298:
::::::::::::It does not tell you why they don't exist. It tells you why some people believe they don't exist, and also tells you why some other people believe they do exist. It does not take sides. It does not tell you which one is correct. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 18:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
::::::::::::It does not tell you why they don't exist. It tells you why some people believe they don't exist, and also tells you why some other people believe they do exist. It does not take sides. It does not tell you which one is correct. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 18:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
:::::::::::::But shouldn't it really? I mean if it is really based on reliable sources (as Wikipedia defines them)? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:18, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
:::::::::::::But shouldn't it really? I mean if it is really based on reliable sources (as Wikipedia defines them)? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:18, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
19:01, 31 August 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs) (5,879 bytes) (→Criticism and rebuttals - belongs on talk page - please don't accuse me of removing criticism because of bias)
::What is the problem with merging the old [Conservapedia] article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
::What is the problem with merging the old [Conservapedia] article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
:::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
:::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
1,136

edits

Navigation menu