1,136
edits
(→Criticism: real criticism) |
|||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Although it claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its users are hostile towards religion. It has also been accused of containing "...filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes" [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127] | Although it claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its users are hostile towards religion. It has also been accused of containing "...filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes" [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127] | ||
Certain administrator are quite sensitive and controlling when it comes to censoring criticism. For example, watch what happens if you try to suggest that perhaps [[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki (without these being the stated goals of Wikipedia) better than RationalWiki does]]. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== |
edits