174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 09:38, 1 September 2009
, 1 September 2009→Criticism and rebuttals: replies
(→Criticism and rebuttals: replies) |
|||
| Line 305: | Line 305: | ||
::::::::::::::::Seriously, is this the best criticism you can come up with? That the wiki has no chance to compete with Wikipedia, even though it's '''not even trying to'''? That's not even criticism. You can criticize Conservapedia for having delusions of grandeur (Schlafly said that they would surpass Wikipedia in a few years), but RationalWiki isn't even trying to be a general encyclopedia, and it actively enforces this by removing articles that do not fit its mission. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:29, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::::::::::Seriously, is this the best criticism you can come up with? That the wiki has no chance to compete with Wikipedia, even though it's '''not even trying to'''? That's not even criticism. You can criticize Conservapedia for having delusions of grandeur (Schlafly said that they would surpass Wikipedia in a few years), but RationalWiki isn't even trying to be a general encyclopedia, and it actively enforces this by removing articles that do not fit its mission. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:29, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::::Umm let me see if you are understanding the point being made here. (Nothing that you have said has indicated that you do.) We completely agree that the '''''stated''''' goals RW and Wikipedia are different. I'm just wondering whether this is true beyond superficial rhetoric. Why did we discontinue the discussion here and begin editing? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:20, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::::Umm let me see if you are understanding the point being made here. (Nothing that you have said has indicated that you do.) We completely agree that the '''''stated''''' goals RW and Wikipedia are different. I'm just wondering whether this is true beyond superficial rhetoric. Why did we discontinue the discussion here and begin editing? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:20, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::::::::Yes, it is true. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 05:38, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::::::::::::::::In response to your edit (what's with the strikeouts?): | |||
<del>Certain administrator are quite sensitive and controlling when it comes to censoring criticism. For example, watch what happens if you try to suggest that perhaps</del> [[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki (without these being the stated goals of Wikipedia) better than RationalWiki does]]. | |||
::::::::::::::::::::Wikipedia cannot achieve the stated goals of RW because of its NPOV policy. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 05:38, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
===A very rare example of Lumenos misunderstanding=== | ===A very rare example of Lumenos misunderstanding=== | ||