1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 15:28, 1 September 2009
, 1 September 2009→Criticism and rebuttals
| Line 276: | Line 276: | ||
:::::Lumenos, you ''really'' don't understand what RW ''is'' do you? As in, embarrassingly so? (Granted it's down right now, but its goals are listed in this article). It's got nothing to do with wikipedia. It's ''not'' an encyclopedia. And why have you made such a mess of this talk page? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:21, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::Lumenos, you ''really'' don't understand what RW ''is'' do you? As in, embarrassingly so? (Granted it's down right now, but its goals are listed in this article). It's got nothing to do with wikipedia. It's ''not'' an encyclopedia. And why have you made such a mess of this talk page? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:21, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::I almost missed your post way up here. Maybe this wasn't clear. I'm ''only'' referring to the following stated goals which I think Wikipedia achieves to a much greater degree than RationalWiki can ever hope to. I'm sorry if that sounds harsh but I hope that my critical views will not put me at odds with the community or administration of RW because it seems like a fun place when it doesn't take itself too seriously: | ::::::I almost missed your post way up here. Maybe this wasn't clear. I'm ''only'' referring to the following stated goals which I think Wikipedia achieves to a much greater degree than RationalWiki can ever hope to. I'm sorry if that sounds harsh but I hope that my critical views will not put me at odds with the community or administration of RW because it seems like a fun place when it doesn't take itself too seriously: | ||
::::::*Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people. | |||
::::::*Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas. | |||
::::::*Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. | |||
[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:32, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:32, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::No it ''isn't''. It is that we have a specific point of view; a scientific one. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:10, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::No it ''isn't''. It is that we have a specific point of view; a scientific one. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:10, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::I wasn't talking about dirty words Lumenos, I was talking about not being neutral. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::I wasn't talking about dirty words Lumenos, I was talking about not being neutral. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||