1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 15:38, 1 September 2009
, 1 September 2009→Criticism and rebuttals
| Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
::::::*Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas. | ::::::*Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas. | ||
::::::*Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. | ::::::*Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. | ||
::::::[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | ::::::I believe it is nearly a measurable fact that [[Wikipedia]] is able to achieve these objectives to a far greater degree than RationalWiki, but I have answered a number of arguments to the contrary, if you would like to respond to any of those, or come up with a new one. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:38, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::The talk page is completely editable, I don't see why you and Nx seem to think that whatever "wandalous" damage has been done to the talk page, cannot be easily repaired. How are talk pages supposed to look in your view? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:33, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::The talk page is completely editable, I don't see why you and Nx seem to think that whatever "wandalous" damage has been done to the talk page, cannot be easily repaired. How are talk pages supposed to look in your view? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:33, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::No it ''isn't''. It is that we have a specific point of view; a scientific one. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:10, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::No it ''isn't''. It is that we have a specific point of view; a scientific one. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:10, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||