1,136
edits
User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Reordering talk page comments
m (→Copyrights) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::::::::::::Yes. You moved my comment were I was directly responding to the comment above, claiming I was off topic. That was not nice. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:42, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::::::Yes. You moved my comment were I was directly responding to the comment above, claiming I was off topic. That was not nice. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:42, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::'''Nooooow you tell me, you didn't appreciate that. Well I restored the one I think you are talking about. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:59, 1 September 2009 (EDT) ''' | :::::::::::::'''Nooooow you tell me, you didn't appreciate that. Well I restored the one I think you are talking about. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:59, 1 September 2009 (EDT) ''' | ||
:::::::::::::Well what I would do, is just create a new section named after the argument you wish to make and copy everything relevant to that argument there. I know what you are referring to, and am not certain that it was off topic. | :::::::::::::Well what I would do, is just create a new section named after the argument you wish to make and copy everything relevant to that argument there. I know what you are referring to, and am not certain that it was off topic. [You] responded to [my] statement like you had just learned what the topic of the section was, but I don't know. That could be moved back. Don't feel too inhibited, especially if I am doing something unprecedented, to revert such changes if they are inappropriate, in your view. But umm I guess it doesn't bother you that you appeared to be arguing for something which you later stated that you did not care about. Well but then you had a different reason, I guess. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT) [Update: bracket text are typos that were updated. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:42, 2 September 2009 (EDT)] | ||
(undent) I was responding to the previous comment. That it was off-topic in your opinion is irrelevant. It was very much on-topic IMHO because your argument was that RW was going to remove all criticism of CP, therefore WikiIndex should promote Liberapedia as and alternative. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | (undent) I was responding to the previous comment. That it was off-topic in your opinion is irrelevant. It was very much on-topic IMHO because your argument was that RW was going to remove all criticism of CP, therefore WikiIndex should promote Liberapedia as and alternative. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||