User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:


You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT)  
You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT)  
:'''''[For others who are reading this, I believe Nx is referring to the dialog beginning with the [[Talk:RationalWiki#Similar_wikis|Similar Wikis "debate map"]] that I and Nx created on that talk page (although he is presently acting as though he was unaware of this) and subsequent "mass quoting" to which Nx expressed no objections that I remember. Bob also is acting as if he is aware of this, thus prompting me to create this clarification notice. ;-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT)]''''' You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
:'''''[For others who are reading this, I believe Nx is referring to the dialog beginning with the [[Talk:RationalWiki#Similar_wikis|Similar Wikis "debate map"]] that I and Nx created on that talk page (although he is presently acting as though he was unaware of this) and subsequent "mass quoting" to which Nx expressed no objections that I remember. Bob is also apparently acting as if he is unaware of this, thus prompting me to create this clarification notice. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:36, 4 September 2009 (EDT)''''' You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
::Er, Lumenos, you could also not screw up talk pages in the first place. "Reordering it" would probably consist of reverting to before you mucked it up.  Nice work of applying your rather unique mental processes to a shared space. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:17, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
::Er, Lumenos, you could also not screw up talk pages in the first place. "Reordering it" would probably consist of reverting to before you mucked it up.  Nice work of applying your rather unique mental processes to a shared space. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:17, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
:::Well I wish I'd have known how you both feel about this, before I went to all that effort. I suppose you could revert it, but Nx did much work on it since the first reordering. He was certainly aware of it long before he complained, as the edit history shows. I made it into a "debate map". Did you feel that it was misleading, biased, or hard to read? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:47, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
:::Well I wish I'd have known how you both feel about this, before I went to all that effort. I suppose you could revert it, but Nx did much work on it since the first reordering. He was certainly aware of it long before he complained, as the edit history shows. I made it into a "debate map". Did you feel that it was misleading, biased, or hard to read? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:47, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
1,136

edits

Navigation menu