60
edits
Talk:RationalWikiWiki: Difference between revisions
→Controversial?: let's assume good faith
(→Controversial?: let's assume good faith) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Could somebody explain what is controversial about this article?--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:35, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | Could somebody explain what is controversial about this article?--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:35, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Nothing. Dilley has decided that all wikis related to RW are in the middle of a giant brawl which has spilled over to Wikiindex, and is refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious. The major problem with this wiki seems to be CP syndrome: administrators being incapable of admitting they are in error or of changing their minds. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 14:38, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | :Nothing. Dilley has decided that all wikis related to RW are in the middle of a giant brawl which has spilled over to Wikiindex, and is refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious. The major problem with this wiki seems to be CP syndrome: administrators being incapable of admitting they are in error or of changing their minds. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 14:38, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Hi PH. Well, let's give then a chance to respond and assume good faith. Maybe there is a good reason for blocking this one, or maybe it was a mistake. If somebody reacted hastily no doubt they will fix it.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:52, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||