1,136
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
double wamy
(Don't edit other's comments, you immature little toddler.) |
(double wamy) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:What bloody conflict?! The only recent edit was Rpeh updating the stats! Ugh... UPDATE people SET sanity="insane" WHERE name="MarkDilley"; [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 10:08, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | :What bloody conflict?! The only recent edit was Rpeh updating the stats! Ugh... UPDATE people SET sanity="insane" WHERE name="MarkDilley"; [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 10:08, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::I've already [http://www.wikiindex.org/User_talk:MarkDilley#Deletions_and_Protections made that point] but fingers seem to be in ears and the strains of "La la la! Can't hear you!" echo over the land. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 10:18, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ::I've already [http://www.wikiindex.org/User_talk:MarkDilley#Deletions_and_Protections made that point] but fingers seem to be in ears and the strains of "La la la! Can't hear you!" echo over the land. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 10:18, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Very well then. Perhaps people have left this place because it was so boring before this event, and that is why you were unaware of any [[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|conflict]]. Would you gentlemen make controversy out of a harmless proposal to have pages devoted to criticism (or debate) for wikis such as these? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:30, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
---- | |||
As of 20 December 2008, Conservapedia had 26,529 registered users, most of whom are blocked. Some 30 users (or 0.11%) are Administrators. | As of 20 December 2008, Conservapedia had 26,529 registered users, most of whom are blocked. Some 30 users (or 0.11%) are Administrators. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
==Now what?== | ==Now what?== | ||
Are we supposed to edit this or just list suggestions? In any case, I think the "Suggested guidelines for prospective editors" section should be removed. Wikiindex shouldn't encourage sockpuppeting and should remain neutral [[User:Nx|Nx]] 07:29, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | Are we supposed to edit this or just list suggestions? In any case, I think the "Suggested guidelines for prospective editors" section should be removed. Wikiindex shouldn't encourage sockpuppeting and should remain neutral [[User:Nx|Nx]] 07:29, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Editing above the TOC. I'll second that proposal! [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:30, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||